
Observers say bias claims hard to make against MCAS
By Adam Gorlick, Associated Press, 9/19/2002 18:44
SPRINGFIELD, Mass. (AP) Public schools aren't giving poor and
minority students the education they need to pass the MCAS, an exam that state
education officials illegally turned into a high school graduation
requirement, according to a federal lawsuit filed against the state Thursday.
Lawyers for six unnamed students from Holyoke, Northampton and Springfield
who failed the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System say the test
discriminates against black and Hispanic students, students with limited
English skills and disabilities, and vocational students.
Education observers, however, say the plaintiffs may have a hard time
making their case.
''We haven't found anything in the MCAS that would be supportive of the
claim that it's biased,'' said Stephen Sireci, co-director of the Center for
Educational Assessment at the University of Massachusetts.
Sireci, who has conducted independent studies of the MCAS, said the
plaintiffs are correct in their claims that minority and poor students in city
schools don't score as well as their white peers in affluent and suburban
schools. But the reason is not the MCAS itself, he said.
''You have to focus on the problems dealing with the inequities, like
funding and resources that are available in the students' homes,'' he said.
''It's not because the test itself is discriminatory.''
Tom Frongillo, one of the lawyers who filed the lawsuit in U.S. District
Court in Springfield, called the MCAS ''invalid, unreliable and unfair.''
''These students will be denied the opportunity to attend college, they
will be denied many job opportunities in the private and public sectors,''
Frongillo said. ''In addition they will be stigmatized, branded as failures.''
The plaintiffs want a judge to order the state to better train teachers and
stop using the MCAS as a graduation requirement.
Education Commissioner David Driscoll, who is named in the suit along with
the state Board of Education and the Holyoke public school system, said 12,000
students in the class of 2003 have not passed the MCAS.
Overall, 81 percent of seniors have passed.
Eighty-seven percent of the white seniors have passed and 83 percent of
Asian seniors have passed.
Fifty-six percent of black seniors have passed, while half of the state's
Hispanic seniors passed.
Thirty-five percent of seniors with limited English proficiency have
passed, and 55 percent of seniors with disabilities have passed.
Driscoll defended the test and said it has raised student performance. He
said 16,000 students flunked the test two years ago, 4,000 more than the
current failure rate.
''We are making progress,'' he said. ''What kind of progress were we making
before MCAS?''
Holyoke School Superintendent Eduardo Carballo said his students have
ranked last in the state on some MCAS tests. Still, he said, the city was
prepared to defend its work in helping students learn the material covered on
the test.
''We're fulfilling the state requirements like everyone else,'' he said.
But the lawsuit says schools have not done enough to teach students what
they need to know in order to pass the MCAS.
''State education officials have utterly failed to satisfy their important
obligation and responsibilities to to the state and its public school
students,'' the lawsuit says.
Other lawyers have made similar claims in unsuccessful lawsuits in other
states.
In 2000, a federal judge rejected claims that the Texas Assessment of
Academic Skills discriminated against black and Hispanic students in that
state.
''The claim that minority students aren't doing well on these tests hasn't
been enough to give the courts reason for racial discrimination and bias,''
said Martha McCarthy, an educational law and policy professor at the
University of Indiana. ''These claims don't sound unusual, and similar suits
just haven't been successful.''
The plaintiffs in the MCAS case also say the Board of Education broke the
law by making passage of the test a requirement for high school graduation.
They say the Education Reform Act of 1993, which led to the creation of the
MCAS, never intended the test to be used as a graduation requirement.
The lawsuit says the MCAS designed to be one part of an improved system to
improve education.
Education officials say the plaintiffs are looking at the law wrong.
''It is spelled out in the Education Reform Act that it is perfectly legal
for the Board of Education to have made passing the MCAS a graduation
requirement,'' said Education Department spokeswoman Heidi Perlman. ''It says
so very clearly in the law.''
Preston Green, a professor of educational law at the University of
Massachusetts, said the plaintiffs would likely have a hard time proving the
MCAS is being used illegally.
''Generally, state agencies are given a lot of flexibilities in
interpreting how they apply laws,'' he said. ''It would be surprising if the
court accepted this argument.''